Learn how effective complaint file management can improve product safety, regulatory compliance, and customer satisfaction for medical device manufacturers. Discover best practices for complaint handling and investigation under FDA’s QSR guidelines.
Complaint File Management
Complaint files are often dismissed as something that merely provides a repository of documentation and accountability, but they can change the healthcare world. These files are the eyes and ears of medical device companies, helping them to gain important customer feedback from users, healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders. Manufacturers can use the information in these files to determine root causes of major and minor problems, repair wasteful processes, and develop a continuous improvement plan for their products or services.
There is a unique concept behind each medical device which aims to provide relief, healing, and well-being of the patient, hence they ought to adhere to safety and efficacy standards. To do this, various regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have developed a thorough set of guidelines/rules that dictate the quality management systems for device manufacturers.
A key regulation is the Quality System Regulation (QSR), a foundation of US medical device compliance found in Title 21, Subchapter H – Medical Devices, Part 820. These regulatory issues are summarized in Subpart M, which highlights the stringent requirements and essential nature of managing and maintaining complaint files.
Why you need to know about complaint files:
Complaint files are needed sections of a medical device manufacturers quality or QMS. Complaint handling systems are used to record and track information pertaining to the filing of complaints by customers, users or other third parties who experience a problem with a medical device. Complaint files include information on the performance and failures of a product which can translate into direct feedback to address if something is wrong. When managed, complaint files can act as a measure to prevent recurrence, ensure product quality, and improve patient safety.
Why Complaint Files Matter:
Complaint files provide unique insights into how our medical devices perform in the real-world. They provide a direct point of contact for end-users with manufacturers that enable you to react quickly and well-informed after issues are reported. These files contain thousands upon thousands of complaints, from nuisance issues to serious adverse events that pose an extreme risk to patient safety.
In addition, medical device manufacturers should see complaint files not only as containers for complaints but also as tools for growth and product improvement. With every complaint comes an opportunity to improve, a chance to optimise design, manufacturing, and post-market surveillance. If handled the right way, complaint files can indeed act as a change agent and represent a true representation of patient first manufacturing commitment.
Complaint File Management Requirement:
The QSR specifies requirement of how the complaint files are handled to ensure that all complaints are managed as uniformly and thoroughly as possible. Adherence to these requirements is essential for a medical device manufacturer in order to gain regulatory approval and stay on market. The complaint file management process should include the following elements:
Formal Designated Unit:
Manufacturers are required to create a formally designated unit where complaints can be reported, reviewed, and evaluated regarding the product. It is a one stop centre for all complaints, accountability, and consistency in evaluation. This unit should consist of people who have the required skills to classify and respond to all types of complaints.
Swift and uniform processing:
Swift development of complaints is vital to make sure that all the grievances are attended efficiently. Standard operating procedures (SOP) help in the process of complaint handling by setting a standard mechanism, which helps avoid delay and discrepancies in addressing complaints.
Documenting Oral Complaints:
It is reasonable enough to document the written complaints, but oral complaints should also be given equal footing. Whether the complaint occurs via oral means or written process, it is up to manufacturers to ensure that the necessary documentation is recorded as soon as they receive a complaint. Data from oral complaints are critical in gaining insight into the nature of concerns raised and triggering action accordingly.
Investigation Evaluation:
When a manufacturer receives a complaint, it must make an initial evaluation as to whether or not an investigation is warranted. It applies to evaluating the severity of a complaint, the potential risk factor towards safety of patients and interaction with device specifications. If no investigation is warranted then that needs to be documented, as well as who made the decision.
Complaints involving the potential failure of a device, labeling, or packaging to meet specifications should be thoroughly investigated. A process of investigation allows us to understand the root cause of the problem, its impact and scope, and also helps in defining corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) that can help prevent such an occurrence from happening again. Each complaint needs to be considered on its own unless it has already been investigated and no additional investigation is necessary.
MDR
For a complaint that is, or may lead to, an event reportable to the FDA under the Medical Device Reporting (MDR) regulation (part 803), it should be prioritized for review/evaluation/investigation. The complaint must be kept separate, and the investigation must include specific findings with respect to device malfunction and the device’s connection, to an incident or adverse advent reported. It is important that any such events be reported to the FDA so we can all continue living a life of transparency and working on safety concerns once they arise.
Complaint File elements
Under the QSR, manufacturers are required to maintain records in detail in the complaint file. They should keep the following records:
Complaint Details
Here is where we find the name of device, date complaint received, UDI or UPC and other related control numbers for a device. The correct identification is important to trace the complaints and link them to a specific device or batch of products.
Information of the complainant:
Provide Name, Address, and phone number of the complainant to get in touch for further investigation process if needed. This will enable effective correspondence (between you and the manufacturer) and ensure that the manufacturer can update or resolve matters with the complainant.
It is always relevant to find out the actual nature and details of the complaint; It helps to better understand what has happened as per the complainant. The complaint details, including context surrounding the complaint, nature of the problem encountered and occurrence details pertaining to patient or user impacted.
Investigation Documentation: Have a record of the investigation process that records each action taken to assess and act upon the complaint. Investigation records must include the dates when the complaint was investigated, results, root cause analysis, any corrective actions taken and replies provided to the complainants. Using this information is significant for planning suitable corrective and preventive actions to avoid similar types of complaints in the future.
Quality management of medical devices is incomplete without complaint files. For this reason, the requirements associated with handling complaints or adverse event reporting are set forth in a regulation known as the Quality System Regulation, which must be enforced by manufacturers in a more rapid and uniform fashion.
Conclusion
Well managed complaint file helps to recognize the possible issue with a product, consumer problem and compliance of Regulatory Standards that ensures device safety & quality. Ensure that complaint files are appropriately handled, leading to a process of continuous improvement, customer confidence, and safety critical products on the market. In turn, medical device manufacturers can build upon these attributes and ensure the highest standards for product quality and safety within their domain.
Reach out to BioBoston Consulting today or check us out on our website and see how we can support you.
